HELENA — Lawmakers got a look Tuesday at the first of several major tax policy proposals included in Gov. Greg Gianforte’s budget to be formally presented to the Legislature. Proponents say the measure will boost small businesses by exempting more of their property from the state’s equipment tax.
That change will exempt an additional 4,000 businesses from the tax, including approximately 1,500 farming and ranching operations, Department of Revenue Director Brendan Beatty testified during Tuesday’s hearing before the House Taxation Committee. He also said the measure would boost hundreds of businesses in the natural resource, construction, hospitality and real estate rental industries.
“If you’re one of those 4,000 taxpayers, you won’t even have to file a form with the Montana Department of Revenue,” Beatty said.
The equipment tax, levied on business-owned property like tractors, construction tools and manufacturing equipment, has been a longtime target of pro-business groups such as the Montana Chamber of Commerce, which argue that it stifles business investment and job creation.
“Personal property taxes like the business equipment tax are a tax on inputs and, in our opinion, therefore tend to discourage capital investment,” chamber lobbyist Bridger Mahlum said at Tuesday’s hearing.
Mahlum also argued the tax puts Montana at a competitive disadvantage against neighboring states that don’t levy an equipment tax. The chamber, he said, would like to see the tax eliminated outright, though he acknowledged that may be unlikely this session.
The state’s equipment tax rate was as high as 12% in the 1980s, according to a research brief authored for the 2015 legislative session by the chamber’s then-Government Relations Director Glenn Oppel, who is now Gianforte’s policy director. Montana lawmakers have scaled the tax back drastically under both Democratic and Republican administrations in recent decades, successively reducing the overall tax rate and raising the exemption threshold.
In its current form, the equipment tax exempts the first $100,000 of equipment owned by a business — meaning many small businesses don’t pay the tax at all — and levies a 1.5% rate on equipment valued up to an additional $6 million, and then 3% on anything more than that. According to the Department of Revenue, Montana businesses paid about $99 million in equipment taxes in 2019.
The revenue department’s fiscal analysis of HB 303 indicates it would reduce equipment tax collections by about $4 million a year. That money is currently split between state coffers and local governments like cities and school districts. The bill contains provisions designed to compensate local government entities for the reduced revenue from the state General Fund.
The bill was opposed at Tuesday’s hearing by some left-leaning groups that expressed concern the tax reduction will eventually force the state to cut spending on education and social services.
Rose Bender, an analyst with the Montana Budget and Policy Center, said the repeated business equipment tax cuts have pushed more tax burden onto residential property owners.
“The reality is, over the last 25 years, homeowners in Montana have seen their property tax obligation grow in relation to the owners of business equipment. This change has occurred despite the fact that the total market value of business equipment in Montana has increased dramatically,” Bender said.
At a separate press briefing Tuesday, House Minority Leader Kim Abbott, D-Helena, said it’s “not true” that the proposed equipment tax cut will help small businesses.
“Small businesses already don’t pay this tax,” Abbott said. “This isn’t a solution that’s going to move us forward.”
After Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock signed a prior business equipment tax cut into law in 2013, the revenue department estimated the $100,000 threshold would lift the equipment tax entirely on 11,000 of the 17,000 businesses then paying it, according to Lee newspapers.
In addition to the Chamber of Commerce, HB 303 was formally supported at Tuesday’s hearing by representatives from the Farm Bureau Federation, Grain Growers Association, Wool Growers Association, Petroleum Association, Montana Mining Association and Montana Wood Products Association, among other industry groups.
The bill is one of several pending tax measures that would implement different parts of Gianforte’s budget proposal, which the governor has touted as a multifaceted “comeback plan” for the state economy. Another, Senate Bill 159, which would cut some income taxes, is set for a hearing before the Senate Taxation Committee Thursday morning.
Changes to the judicial branch, the budget surplus and tax proposals.
For the second session in a row, Montana State University’s $38 million request for a new Gallatin College building failed to make the governor’s proposed budget. President Waded Cruzado and local supporters aren’t giving up.
The agency’s announcement was welcomed by Republican officials, who’ve long sought to restore management of grizzly bears to state agencies. Environmentalists questioned whether USFWS is fulfilling the mandates of the Endangered Species Act and cast doubt on Montana’s ability to manage grizzlies sustainably.
This story is published by Montana Free Press as part of the Long Streets Project, which explores Montana’s economy with in-depth reporting. This work is supported in part by a grant from the Greater Montana Foundation, which encourages communication on issues, trends, and values of importance to Montanans. Discuss MTFP’s Long Streets work with Lead Reporter Eric Dietrich at email@example.com.