A legislative committee voted Wednesday night to table House Bill 642, which sought to expand an existing loophole exempting some wells from a Department of Natural Resources permitting process.
With little in the way of discussion, the House Natural Resources Committee amended and then tabled HB 642. As originally proposed, HB 642 would have granted some well owners access to additional groundwater and expanded the permitting loophole to allow subdivisions larger than 20 acres additional groundwater without going through a permitting process to ensure there are no adverse impacts to neighboring water rights holders. Exempt wells are frequently used to secure water for new construction in areas where all available surface water has already been spoken for.
Rep. Llew Jones, R-Conrad, requested an amendment to establish a stakeholder group overseen by the DNRC to hash out issues related to exempt wells and the policies governing their use. The amendment also sought to establish in Montana law that the well-permitting exemption applies to a subdivision involving a family transfer of land.
related
Legislature wades into exempt-well debate
Exempt wells are the source of one of the biggest water fights before state lawmakers, who are making a concerted effort to increase housing supply in one of the nation’s fastest-growing states without instigating a knock-down, drag-out fight with agricultural producers.
Democrats unanimously opposed the amendment, along with Rep. Russ Miner, R-Great Falls.
Immediately after amending the measure, the committee took a roll call vote on a motion to advance HB 642 to the floor, which failed on a 5-10 vote. It is now tabled.
Bill sponsor Casey Knudsen, R-Malta, was not available for a comment by press time Thursday evening.
HB 642 opponent and Clark Fork Coalition Legal Director Andrew Gorder said he’s pleased the committee listened to stakeholders, who turned out in force to oppose the bill during its Feb. 22 hearing.
“I had a good feeling after the first committee hearing, but we certainly weren’t resting easy,” Gorder said. “Anything can happen at the Legislature and there’s a lot of horse trading that happens behind the scenes.”
“To me, the outcome here is an indication that although the development industry holds a lot of clout in the statehouse, there are certain issues where big money can’t necessarily buy you what you want. Protecting our water resources is one of those issues,” Gorder said.
At this point in the session, It’s unlikely that HB 642 will be revived — in its current form, anyway — unless at least 55 representatives opt to “blast” it onto the floor for a vote.
The Montana Realtors Association, one of the groups that had backed the bill, could not be reached for comment.
HB 642 proponents had said it would put more certainty into Montana code and ultimately streamline construction processes, thereby making housing prices more affordable for Montanans.
latest stories
The Battle for Clean Energy in Coal Country
Montana has a long history of making money by extracting and exporting its natural resources, namely coal. State politicians and Montana’s largest electricity utility company seem set on keeping it that way.
Gianforte announces leadership change at Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks
Dustin Temple, who’s been serving as the agency’s acting director, will take Worsech’s place overseeing the department. Worsech, who’d been on medical leave since February, is retiring from FWP for a second time. Prior to taking the director post, Worsech served as the agency’s license bureau chief.
As Medicaid purge begins, ‘staggering numbers’ of Americans lose coverage
The overwhelming majority of people who have lost coverage in most states were dropped because of technicalities, not because state officials determined they no longer meet Medicaid income limits. Four out of every five people dropped so far either never returned the paperwork or omitted required documents, according to a KFF Health News analysis of…