“Ghost candidate” allegations against Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen and primary challenger Logan Olson have been dismissed by the state Commissioner of Political Practices.
Commissioner Chris Gallus has ruled that Knudsen did nothing wrong in recruiting Logan Olson to run against him in the 2024 Republican primary, an arrangement that allowed Knudsen to fundraise for a primary race in which Olson wasn’t actively campaigning.
Montana Democratic Party Director Sheila Hogan filed a complaint against the two Republicans after a recording surfaced of Knudsen telling supporters about his arrangement with Olson.
“Candidate recruitment is permitted so long as there is not an ongoing effort to communicate that would result in coordination,” Gallus said in his findings, filed Thursday, July 18. “There are no facts showing that Mr. Olson and Attorney General Knudsen engaged in such efforts.”
RELATED
Attorney General Knudsen accused of soliciting ghost competitor for campaign finance purposes
Incumbent Attorney General Austin Knudsen and his opponent in the GOP primary face political practices complaints following reports that Knudsen acknowledged recruiting an opponent so he could accept larger donations.
Finding that Knudsen’s recruitment of Olson was unacceptable would have upended more than 30 years of enforcement during which other candidates have essentially done the same.
“Such action would result in an abrupt change without notice to candidates, exposing them to severe penalties,” the commissioner said.
Olson will have to pay a $4,525 civil action penalty for failing to properly report his filing fee, which was paid for by Chuck Denowh, of Standard Consulting. The fee paid by Denowh should have been reported as an in-kind contribution, Gallus concluded, and the payment also amounted to a larger contribution than Montana law allows.
LATEST STORIES
Supreme Court puts Butte’s data center initiative back on the ballot
General election voters in Butte-Silver Bow County may now consider a proposed ballot initiative that would require citizen approval of data center development, after the Montana Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling that prevented the initiative from appearing on the November ballot. In a court filing responding to the decision, the county said it intends to comply, but is unsure of how to follow the ruling and remain in compliance with the Montana Election Code, since ballots have already been printed — and some have already been sent and returned — without the initiative.
Staving off development, Madison County passes first citizen-initiated zoning districts
County commissioners passed effort unanimously after three-year campaign by local organizers.
Meet the Flathead Valley judges squaring off for a state Supreme Court seat
11th District Court judges Amy Eddy and Dan Wilson are competing for the state Supreme Court in an unusual race between two judges from the same court. But more interesting than the commonality of the candidates’ current jobs is the politicized flavor of the nominally nonpartisan race. Adding to the race’s ideological dynamic, the campaigns’ partisan overtones are playing out as Montanans will consider on the same November ballot a constitutional initiative — CI-132 — that would require judicial races in Montana to remain nonpartisan, as they have been for decades.
