The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service this week released a final recovery plan for Canada lynx, a threatened, snow-adapted species partial to northern forests.
Recovery plans are sometimes called “roadmaps to recovery.” Federal wildlife managers use them to outline risks to a threatened or endangered species’ survival and identify objective criteria for measuring recovery efforts.
Threats to Canada lynx that USFWS identified in its recovery plan include a reduction of habitat in the western U.S. that’s capable of sustaining populations of resident lynx and a warming climate that’s reducing the wintertime conditions lynx rely on to hunt snowshoe hare, a rabbit that accounts for most of the lynx’s winter diet.
The plan arose from a legal settlement between the federal government and six environmental groups that had argued in a 2020 lawsuit that USFWS’ lack of action had left the species “in limbo.” Plaintiffs in that lawsuit, including Friends of the Wild Swan and WildEarth Guardians, also took issue with the agency’s 2017 determination that Canada lynx had recovered and therefore no longer required federal protection. That conclusion, the groups had argued, had “no scientific support.”
As part of the agreement, USFWS dropped its earlier plan to delist lynx in the Lower 48 and agreed to prepare a final recovery plan within three years. The agency’s announcement Wednesday follows the agency’s release of a draft plan in 2023.
In addition to adopting a recovery plan, USFWS has proposed revisions to critical habitat — areas where land managers are expected to take particular care to avoid activities that could jeopardize the recovery of a threatened species. Such activities that affect lynx include trapping, including the trapping of other species, and logging.
RELATED
Feds and conservation groups reach agreement on Canada lynx
Under President Joe Biden, USFWS has changed its tack on Canada lynx management, agreeing to prepare a recovery plan for the forest-dwelling cats for the first time in the 20-plus years the species has been listed as threatened.
Slow-rolling lynx recovery
A coalition of conservation organizations has sued the U.S. Department of Interior and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on grounds that the government has failed to prepare a recovery plan for Canada lynx a full 20 years after the species was designated as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
WildEarth Guardians Conservation Director Lindsay Larris wrote in an email to Montana Free Press that she’s encouraged by the new plan and hopeful that the proposed critical habitat rule survives the upcoming administration change.
“Finally, after decades of litigation and political gamesmanship, we are encouraged to see the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service taking meaningful steps to protect the Canada lynx in the Western United States through a recovery plan and designation of additional critical habitat, including the Southern Rockies,” Larris wrote. “The Canada lynx is fighting to survive in the face of climate change and needs its habitat to be protected. This is what the Endangered Species Act requires, and we hope this proposed rule is finalized despite changes in the federal government.”
Jim Zelenak, a USFWS wildlife biologist who has been working on lynx management for a dozen years, said the proposed rule is based on research from the U.S. Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain Research Station demonstrating that lynx are more prevalent in the mountains of southern Colorado than previously thought and less common in the northern reaches of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. As a result, USFWS has proposed removing critical habitat designation for southern Montana and much of northern Wyoming.
“There’s some boreal-like forest features throughout much of that country, but the new habitat modeling has kind of confirmed what we felt for a long time, which is that most of that Greater Yellowstone Area is not lynx habitat,” Zelenak told MTFP. “They occasionally sit down for a while [and] they may produce some young, but there’s not a resilient resident breeding population there.”
Matthew Bishop, a Western Environmental Law Center attorney who represented the environmental groups in their lawsuit against USFWS, wrote in an email to MTFP that he’s encouraged to see the proposed critical habitat designations for northern Idaho and in Colorado’s San Juan Mountains. He said he intends to take a closer look at the agency’s decision to exclude much of the Greater Yellowstone.
The proposed rule will be open for public comment for 60 days. USFWS will review the comments it receives and is expected to issue a final rule in about a year.
LATEST STORIES
How Montana’s federal campaigns are funded
Montana’s federal candidates have arrived at the final stage of the general election largely fueled by individual contributions. National political action committee donations and contributions from congressional leadership committees also play a major role. Here’s a summary of the financial picture for each major candidate who raised at least $90,000 in individual contributions leading up to the Nov. 3 election, including where the bulk of their itemized donors reside.
First Nations celebrate Albertans’ decision to remain a part of Canada
The Blackfoot Confederacy, a coalition of tribes in Montana and Alberta, celebrated Albertans’ decision this week to remain a province within Canada. The “no” vote represents a long-sought victory for First Nations in Alberta, who brought a legal challenge and launched a public information campaign to thwart the secession. Alberta’s independence movement dates back to the Great Depression, though it gained popularity and legitimacy after a handful of events in recent years, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the election of Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Crow Legislature rejects bill to expand enrollment
After nearly two hours of impassioned debate, the Crow Tribe’s Legislature on Wednesday voted down a bill that would dramatically change who counts as a tribal member. The bill, brought by Chairman Frank White Clay, would have revised the tribe’s “blood quantum” standard, effectively making more people eligible for tribal citizenship. Supporters argued that the change was needed to ensure the continued existence of the tribe. Opponents expressed concern over straining federal funding.
