Eight Montana media organizations, including Montana Free Press, have petitioned to join a lawsuit concerning back-channel communications between Montana legislators, lobbyists and stakeholders during the drafting of bills.
The lawsuit stems from legislative staff redacting details about who state lawmakers are consulting with while drafting bills. That information began being blacked out in September following a court ruling shielding the communications of Republican Sen. Keith Regier, R-Kalispell, from voters who sued over the Legislature’s redrawing of political districts in 2023.
The news outlets argue that the Legislature took the court order favoring the Kalispell senator in a specific case too far, violating public access to back-channel communications on bills — a right established by court order in 1995. More broadly, the media petitioners argue that by redacting the information, legislators are violating the right-to-know provisions of the state Constitution.
“The Montana Constitution is unambiguous. ‘No person shall be deprived of the right to examine documents or to observe the deliberations of all public bodies or agencies of state government and its subdivisions, except in cases in which the demand of individual privacy clearly exceeds the merits of public disclosure,’” the news outlets argue. They ask the court to order Legislative Services to stop redacting documents until the lawsuit is decided, likely several months from now.
RELATED
Lawsuit filed to again open details of draft bills to the public
A government watchdog and members of the public are suing to stop Montana’s Legislature from concealing back-channel communications between lawmakers, lobbyists and “stakeholders” drafting bills.
In addition to Montana Free Press, the media petitioners include The Associated Press, Montana Broadcasters Association, Montana Newspaper Association, Hagadone Media, The Daily Montanan, Adams Publishing and Lee Enterprises.
At issue are “junque files,” folders concerning bill drafts that also contain communications between lawmakers, lobbyists, legislative staff and other parties providing input as bills are written. A junque file might show, for instance, communications between oil refinery lobbyists and a lawmaker proposing a tax cut for pipelines. The records also show when amendments to a bill are being submitted directly by a lobbyist perhaps working for a government utility, or a teacher’s union.
In October, a month after Legislative Services started implementing redactions, the Montana Environmental Information Center sued to stop the practice. MEIC, a Helena-based nonprofit focused on state and federal environmental policy, was joined in the lawsuit by Great Falls resident David Saslav and Butte public defender Kaylee Hafer.
All three plaintiffs were denied access to unredacted junque files this fall.
RELATED
Legislature closing access to behind-the-scenes bill influences
The Montana Legislature is prepared to close the door on public access to communications between lawmakers, lobbyists and stakeholders concerning draft bills. Legislative staff informed lawmakers this week that the communications, previously available to the public and frequently examined by journalists, no longer needed to be made publicly available.
It was MEIC that prevailed in a 1995 state lawsuit that determined junque files to be public information.
None of the parties in the October lawsuit against Legislative Services objected to the Montana press plaintiffs intervening in the case, which is before a Cascade County District Court.
The court case that sparked the redactions was brought by voters challenging the 2023 Legislature’s redrawing of Public Service Commission districts. The five-person commission regulates monopolies in cases where, by law or circumstance, customers have no opportunity to shop around for a better deal. The PSC districts are decidedly Republican and slice up seven of Montana’s largest cities in a way the plaintiffs argued diminished the collective voting power of urban Montanans.
The bill that redrew the districts was Sen. Keith Regier’s. When plaintiffs Montana Conservation Voters, former Secretary of State Bob Brown and others petitioned for Regier’s bill-drafting communications, Regier successfully argued that he shouldn’t in a civil action have to testify or produce evidence showing his deliberations for redrawing the districts.
The media organizations seeking to join the lawsuit against Legislative Services argue that Regier’s court-granted privilege is specific to the redistricting lawsuit and shouldn’t extend to matters outside the court where the public’s right to inspect records is long-established.
LATEST STORIES
Where air conditioning is most — and least — common in Montana
About 73% of occupied Montana homes had air conditioning in 2023, according to a new Census Bureau data series. But rates varied widely across the state, from nearly 96% in Custer County to less than 45% in Deer Lodge County. Montana’s overall rate is the fifth-lowest in the nation, and trails all of the states it borders.
A history runs through it: Zinke public lands bill follows long trail
Two decades of Wilderness debate took an unexpected turn on Sept. 9 when Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke announced a bill creating 132,000 acres of new wilderness alongside 181,000 acres of forest restoration areas and 60,000 acres where motorized and bike recreation activity would be permanently authorized. Can Zinke get the bill through Congress before the end of the year?
After weeks of public outcry, Yellowstone County asks state to clarify 2025 data center law
In a letter signed this week, Yellowstone County commissioners asked local legislators to review a new law they said is stopping them from regulating the 5,000-acre project near Broadview by developer Quantica Infrastructure. The letter, approved Tuesday, is addressed to the “Members of the Yellowstone County Legislative Delegation” and asks them to “refine” a 2025 law called the Right to Compute Act. The Legislature is slated to reconvene in 2027.
