This story is adapted from Capitolized, a weekly newsletter featuring expert reporting, analysis and insight from the reporters and editors of Montana Free Press. Want to see Capitolized in your inbox every Thursday? Sign up here.
Senate President Matt Regier, R-Kalispell, will be investigated by the legislative auditor for spending public funds on a private attorney currently contracted as his special counsel.
Senators voted 34-16 on Thursday evening for the investigation into Regier’s use of Abby Moscatel, a Lakeside attorney first hired by Regier in 2023 to serve as his partisan attorney when he was House speaker.
Regier in an interview with Montana Free Press late last month insisted the contracts were compliant with the law.
Sen. Daniel Zolnikov, R-Billings, called for the filing of a “waste, fraud and abuse” complaint against Regier with the legislative auditor, a move similar to a complaint filed by Regier against former Senate president Jason Ellsworth on Jan. 15.
“This would be consistent with the process that the former president [Ellsworth] went through, as we should attempt to stay consistent,” Zolnikov said on the Senate floor Thursday evening. “Let the auditor do the report, and let him [Legislative Auditor Angus Maciver] do findings. That would be intellectually honest and consistent.”
After the vote, the Senate worked quickly through a roster of bills on third reading before adjourning for transmittal break, a period in which hundreds of non-revenue bills passed from one chamber are prepared to proceed in the other. The House lawmakers plan to adjourn for break Friday.
Sen. Shelley Vance, R-Belgrade, got the action rolling Thursday by attempting to refer Regier’s attorney matter to the Senate Rules Committee ahead of a possible ethics investigation. Vance said she first learned of the attorney hire in a report published by the Montana Free Press on March 5.
The news article addressed Regier’s hiring of a “chief legal counsel to the House majority” during the 2023 legislative session at a time when state law only allowed the House speaker and Senate president to share an attorney. Payments to Moscatel were small enough to not require a contract or the signature of the Senate president, who at that time was Ellsworth.
What started in that 2023 session, according to records gathered by Montana Free Press, were taxpayer dollars paid to Moscatel for work she did for the now-Senate president Regier. The work included tasks routinely done by other government employees and legal work that didn’t fit the scope laid out in the law cited in her contract. There was also a contract signed only after the work was done. The total payout from public funds for work during the 2023 session and for two contracts in 2024 was $22,970.
Additionally, the attorney represented Regier and others in a Lake County lawsuit in which plaintiffs challenged the Secretary of State’s certification of two 2024 ballot initiatives, Constitutional Initiative 127, which would have required a majority vote share to win an election, and Constitutional Initiative 126, which would have created a non-partisan four-candidate primary in statewide elections.
Regier refused to say whether taxpayer funds were used to pay for the private lawsuit when asked by Montana Free Press, answering instead that there were no invoices.
“I’m greatly troubled about what I read, and I believe we need to engage in further investigations,” Vance said on the Senate floor Thursday.
Vance said the following things should be investigated:
“Whether the president acted unlawfully by hiring an attorney to perform legal work after the failure of House Bill 260 [in the] the 2023 session, a bill intended to provide legal authority and funding to hire an attorney.
“Second, whether the president engaged in waste, fraud and abuse by hiring an attorney to perform legal tasks that the legal staff and Legislative Services typically perform, such as wordsmithing amendments.
“Third, whether the president acted unlawfully by using state resources to pay for legal services related to a private matter [the Lake County Constitutional Initiative 126 and Constitutional Initiative 127 lawsuit].
“Fourth, whether the president engaged in waste, fraud and abuse by attempting to bifurcate or evade limits of spending authority by accepting invoices for amounts less than $10,000 in legal services.
“Fifth, whether the president acted unlawfully by authorizing or directing his attorney to perform legal work on state and federal immigration laws without lawful authority.
“Sixth, whether the president failed to disclose a conflict of interest regarding Senate Bill 352, regarding immunity for legislative staff, including contracted legislative staff.
“Mr. President, these are many of the same issues raised in the matter involving Sen. Ellsworth. Since we referred Sen. Ellsworth to Ethics, it only makes sense we begin a similar investigation into the current president of the Senate.”
The Senate Ethics Committee is scheduled to hear arguments in the Ellsworth case on Friday. Ellsworth is accused of not disclosing a former business relationship with a man who received a contract for $170,100 to monitor government agencies as they put into practice new laws intended to limit the powers of Montana courts.
A related misdemeanor allegation that Ellsworth circumvented state procurement laws to issue the contract is being investigated by the state Department of Justice.
LATEST STORIES
Where air conditioning is most — and least — common in Montana
About 73% of occupied Montana homes had air conditioning in 2023, according to a new Census Bureau data series. But rates varied widely across the state, from nearly 96% in Custer County to less than 45% in Deer Lodge County. Montana’s overall rate is the fifth-lowest in the nation, and trails all of the states it borders.
A history runs through it: Zinke public lands bill follows long trail
Two decades of Wilderness debate took an unexpected turn on Sept. 9 when Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke announced a bill creating 132,000 acres of new wilderness alongside 181,000 acres of forest restoration areas and 60,000 acres where motorized and bike recreation activity would be permanently authorized. Can Zinke get the bill through Congress before the end of the year?
After weeks of public outcry, Yellowstone County asks state to clarify 2025 data center law
In a letter signed this week, Yellowstone County commissioners asked local legislators to review a new law they said is stopping them from regulating the 5,000-acre project near Broadview by developer Quantica Infrastructure. The letter, approved Tuesday, is addressed to the “Members of the Yellowstone County Legislative Delegation” and asks them to “refine” a 2025 law called the Right to Compute Act. The Legislature is slated to reconvene in 2027.
