Aaron Flint’s fighting form

It was nothing less than political shock and awe that thrust Aaron Flint into the role of Republican nominee in Western Montana’s U.S. House race, which has shaped up to be the state’s most competitive congressional contest in decades.

Flint and Democrat Sam Forstag have been in a statistical tie across several polls conducted since September. President Donald Trump stumped Wednesday for Flint in Kalispell, attempting to give the Iraq War veteran and former talk radio host an edge.

The fuse to Flint’s candidacy was lit March 2, when incumbent Rep. Ryan Zinke announced he would not seek reelection. Zinke, a fixture in congressional politics for more than a decade, immediately threw his support — and his campaign staff and his PAC funding — behind Flint, even as other would-be successors flew toward the opening like moths to a flame.

The surprise announcements from Zinke and Flint came just two days before the candidate filing deadline, but the steps leading to Flint’s ascent had been hiding in plain sight. Zinke had not withdrawn from the race — he had never registered his candidacy.

Flint, 46, who for years had hosted his conservative radio show “Montana Talks” from the 23rd floor of the DoubleTree Hotel in Billings, where he lived, had relocated to Flathead County the previous summer. The timing of the move ensured that Flint’s children would be enrolled in Kalispell-area schools by fall 2025, campaign manager Heather Swift told Montana Free Press in March.

The move also made Flint a resident of the county with the largest number of Republican voters in the Western District, about 10,000 more than second-place Gallatin County. Residing in the Flathead can be the difference of several thousand votes for a candidate seeking federal or statewide office. For example, in the Flathead Valley, Whitefish resident Zinke outperforms Republican candidates from elsewhere. As a candidate for Montana’s at-large House district in 2016, Zinke drew 4,384 more Flathead votes than gubernatorial candidate Greg Gianforte, the only Republican to lose a statewide race that year. In 2024, Zinke received 2,099 more votes in Flathead County than then-Senate candidate Tim Sheehy, who, like Gianforte, hails from the Bozeman area.

The biography that Flint consistently weaves into his messaging is that of a fifth-generation Montanan who grew up in Glasgow, on Montana’s Hi Line, in a single-parent household. Flint later served more than 20 years in the U.S. Army Reserve and is a combat veteran with deployments in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula.

Long before he became a candidate, many conservatives already felt they knew Flint, as he told Montana Free Press a few weeks after launching his campaign.

“It’s a deep relationship that you get the honor of having with people because you’re with them at their breakfast table every morning,” Flint said. “You’re in their pickup while they’re checking on cattle, you’re in the combine cab with them, and they really get to know you — not only what you think about the issues, but who you are as a person. Radio is an incredible way of connecting with people and really getting to be part of the family.”

Radio gave candidate Flint both a ready-made constituency and the combative style that has defined his campaign. During debates Oct. 8 and 13, he described himself as having spent his career “fighting behind the microphone” for Montanans, and repeatedly cast conservatives as targets of government overreach.

During an Oct. 13 debate produced by Montana Free Press and NonStop Local, Flint described new Republican residents of the state as “folks who fled these failed cities on the West Coast, like Portland and Seattle and San Francisco, and they fled the tyranny on the West Coast. They were told to shut down their churches and wear the stupid masks and abide by all these mandates while their Democrat politicians were wining and dining at the French Laundry and elsewhere.”

Flint repeatedly describes conservatives as being harmed, ignored or threatened by “big government,” citing taxes, regulations he says inflate home prices, and noncitizen voting as examples.

Forstag characterizes Flint’s rhetoric as “fearmongering” designed to distract from what the Democrat sees as Flint’s lack of solutions for working people. “Anger and vitriol is all we’re getting from the other side,” Forstag said during the Oct. 13 debate.

Asked during that debate whether he approved of President Donald Trump issuing pardons to people charged with crimes in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, Flint replied: “I was very critical. I was disgusted by what took place on Jan. 6. In fact, I called out that very week on the radio, I called out Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi for refusing to support having more National Guard troops there to defend our Capitol and to defend our Capitol police. My opponent, on the flip side, attacked our law enforcement.”

(Flint’s account misstates who had authority to deploy the National Guard. Although congressional leaders sought military assistance during the riot, the Speaker of the House could not order the Guard to the Capitol. Several members of Congress have falsely suggested otherwise. As the Associated Press has reported, the decision to call National Guard troops to the Capitol is made by the Capitol Police Board, which consists of the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol.)

Flint’s argument that federal overreach and regulation threaten Montana’s interests also underpins his positions on forests, wildlife, water, education, healthcare and immigration.

On wildfire and forest management, Flint suggests that decades of federal mismanagement are the root cause of Montana’s typically smoke-filled summers. He supports federal Good Neighbor Authority agreements, first authorized in the 2014 farm bill, that allow state management of forests and rangeland.

“We’ve got to revitalize our timber industry. We’ve got to fix our forests and stop us from chewing on all this wildfire smoke every single summer,” Flint said in an interview.

“I’m very encouraged by the fact that now you’ve got California Democrats teaming up with Montana Republicans like [Sen.] Tim Sheehy to fix our forests and better fight these fires, and so I’m very encouraged by that, because I think there’s a lot of work we can get done on a bipartisan basis back in Washington, regardless of who controls power,” Flint told MTFP on Oct. 5.

That deference to local control extends to Flint’s push for delisting endangered species like grizzly bears and wolves — animals the candidate blames for reducing the successes of big-game hunters. 

“We should be celebrating the recovery of the grizzly,” Flint said. “I just think, you know, too many wolves and too many grizzlies and the failure to manage our forests are a big part of why we don’t have the big-game hunting opportunities we used to have.”

Flint also frames tribal sovereignty and water rights as examples of failed federal obligations. He says the federal government must uphold treaty agreements while resisting what he characterizes as attempts to take control of Montana’s water. Zinke’s “Fill the Lake Act,” introduced in 2025, would compel the federal government to release water from Hungry Horse Reservoir to keep Flathead Lake from falling more than a foot below full pool during recreation season. Energy Keepers, the corporation formed by the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes to manage Séliš Ksanka QÍispé Dam, called the act unrealistic and pointed to poor snowpack as the cause of low lake levels.

On workforce and education, Flint becomes animated when talking about the trades, the prospect of offering shop class at every high school and aligning federal policy with state government’s emphasis on apprenticeships.

“These are the jobs that can keep Montana kids in Montana with good-paying jobs. Let’s focus on trades and trades education,” Flint said. “And so that’s been a big priority since we launched this campaign, and I think we’ve got to pivot. We’ve got to pivot to that as a nation, not just with higher education, but with K-12 as well.”

Flint’s positions on healthcare and abortion align with national conservative priorities. He calls the 16-year-old Affordable Care Act “a complete train wreck” and attributes problems in the Medicaid and Medicare systems to fraud, ineligible Medicaid enrollees and immigrants living in the country illegally and, he says, receiving benefits.

“We’ve got to crack down on all these fraudsters,” Flint said. “I mean, my goodness, I think we have only seen the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the amount of fraud hitting Medicare and Medicaid.”

Flint said there should be “limits on abortion after the first trimester, with exceptions made to protect the life of the mother and, in tragic instances, a rape. And if a baby does survive an abortion, every medical effort must be made to save that precious life.”

He supports a nationwide concealed-weapons policy, which aligns with his support from the NRA and Gun Owners of America. The Second Amendment “should be comprehensive enough to protect gun rights without added federal restrictions,” Flint said.

Flint returns to themes of local control and skepticism about federal intervention when discussing data centers, the political football of the moment. Montana should welcome data centers, he said, only if doing so does not mean “jacked up electricity rates” or water shortages.

As for artificial intelligence, “The United States of America must be the leader,” Flint said. “We must lead. We cannot let communist China or Russia dominate when it comes to AI, dominate when it comes to data, and dominate when it comes to cyber.”

Montana’s federal delegation has been bullish on artificial intelligence. PACs tied to the industry have donated to Flint’s campaign, while advertising by the Montana Democratic Party has portrayed Flint surrounded by data center servers. 

Regarding immigration, Flint told MTFP the law should make it easier to immigrate legally, but border security needs to be strengthened regardless.

“We’ve seen what I call anarcho-tyranny, where it’s anarchy for illegal aliens coming across our borders, suspected terrorists, drug cartel operatives, [Venezuelan gang] Tren de Aragua thugs,” Flint said. “But then it’s tyranny for the people trying to do things the right way, the legal way. And so if you’re somebody in the agricultural community, it’s tyranny for you if you’re trying to leverage the legal immigration system to fill some gaps, but then it’s anarchy, and they just let anybody come, they just let anybody come across the borders, like drug cartel operatives, Tren de Aragua thugs.”

Asked whether U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents need to improve their arrest and detention practices, given that a U.S. District Court judge in Great Falls had recently ruled that 50 people were wrongfully detained by ICE, Flint blamed the judge.

“This is outrageous from that far-left, Democrat-appointed judge. Once again, we’re seeing judicial activism from these far-left judges, the same far-left judges who destroyed our public lands, who destroyed our timber industry, who destroyed big-game hunting opportunities. These same far-left judges are now trying to turn Montana into a sanctuary state.”

Flint is more measured about the war with Iran, recognizing that rising fuel costs have sharply increased the cost of living, though he contends fuel prices would be even higher if Democrats were in power.

“We need to end the war in Iran,” Flint said, “Once elected in November, I’ll press the president to bring the war to a speedy and conclusive end that eliminates the terrorist threat and reopens the global energy trade. But I tell you what, I thank God that we have a president who is committed to American energy, because if we had some of the crazy policies that my opponent has been backing, we’d be paying twice as much for energy right now.”

Across issues — immigration, wildfire management, abortion and foreign policy — Flint consistently returns to the same line of argument: Montana is under threat from “big government,” “far-left judges” and policies he says have eroded the state’s “way of life.” After years of “fighting behind the microphone,” he is asking voters to send him to Washington swinging.

His pitch is aimed at a sprawling district that includes deep-red Flathead County, fast-growing Gallatin County and liberal Missoula — a varied political landscape in which neither candidate has established a clear lead.

Flint’s candidacy began with political shock and awe. In November, voters will decide whether to reshape western Montana’s representation in Congress in his image.

REPORT AN ERROR

BEST PRACTICES

ABOUT MTFP