A district court judge on Friday rejected a Butte organizer’s request to put a data center initiative on the November ballot after confusion about the signature-gathering deadline tanked the initiative last month. John Meyer, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said they have appealed the decision.
Responding to a proposal for the construction of a large data center in Butte, plaintiff Denise Kelly, the founder of 406 People First, began collecting signatures in June to put a local initiative on the November ballot that would allow voters to approve or reject data center development or expansion. According to court documents, Butte-Silver Bow County officials communicated in a May letter that the organization needed to collect signatures from at least 15% of registered Butte-Silver Bow County voters, or 3,652 people, by Aug. 14 to qualify the initiative for the ballot. On Aug. 10, county election administrator Cynthia Sherman issued a letter, citing Montana statute, stating that signatures needed to have been submitted by July 13, according to court filings.
Kelly and 406 People First sued the county and election administrator on Aug. 12, alleging that the statute had been applied unconstitutionally, hindering the public’s ability to participate in ballot initiative processes. The plaintiffs asked the court to certify the data center initiative for the November ballot.
The city-county government, represented by county attorney Matthew Enrooth, took no position and asked the court to determine how the election administrator should proceed. Enrooth did not respond to a request for comment by press time.
In his Aug. 28 ruling, District Court Judge Frank Joseph rejected the plaintiffs’ constitutionality argument and denied their request to certify the initiative for the ballot.
Joseph wrote that while the plaintiffs had gathered the requisite number of signatures before Aug. 14, there is no way of knowing whether the required number of signatures had been collected by July 13. He found that it was the plaintiffs’ responsibility to “read and understand the statute they were proceeding under.”
“Yes, it appears true that Plaintiffs were provided with incorrect information regarding the law from the Defendants, but it does not relieve the Plaintiffs their obligation to read, understand, and apply the law as clearly written for all to see,” according to the order.
Kelly said she is “really disappointed” by the judge’s decision.
RELATED
Butte nonprofit sues county after data center ballot initiative reversal
A nonprofit working to put data center decisions in the hands of voters in Butte-Silver Bow County is suing the county after its signature-gathering deadline was changed. A district court judge then temporarily ordered Butte-Silver Bow County election officials to ensure the initiative gets on the ballot. A hearing has been set for arguments about…
“We’re spending our time, we’re spending our money, we’re spending our energy to assert our constitutional rights,” she said. “It’s frustrating. We can’t even rely on our elected officials to do their jobs correctly. … It’s ludicrous to me, and I think the people of Butte are really frustrated.”
A similar signature-gathering effort in support of a similar ballot initiative was thwarted last month in Yellowstone County when the Yellowstone County attorney’s office released a memo saying its signature-gathering deadline had passed, citing the same statute referenced in Kelly’s lawsuit. Yellowstone County Attorney Scott Twito told Montana Free Press in August that the county’s revised deadline, also to July 13, was prompted by data center developer Quantica Infrastructure, which made Twito aware of the relevant state statute on July 30.
LATEST STORIES
‘Where they belong’: Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes bring home the remains of three members
In early September, a van leading a caravan home stopped on Big Muddy Creek Bridge, marking the boundary of the Fort Peck reservation. Families embraced, tears were shed, and the smell of burning sage lingered. In the back were three wooden caskets draped in the flags of the Assiniboine and Sioux. Over the following days,…
Federal judge blocks Montana’s AI campaign ad law
A Montana law regulating the use of generative artificial intelligence in campaign ads has been dealt a blow by a federal judge based on freedom of speech concerns. The order greenlights general election advertising that former legislator Dan Bartel and ASG PAC planned to use, but feared being prosecuted for.
Montanans are using AI, but remain wary of its societal impact
Almost four years after OpenAI’s release of ChatGPT, AI is now firmly rooted in many Montanans’ day-to-day tasks, according to a Montana Free Press-Eagleton poll of registered voters conducted in late August and early September. More Montanans use AI — and to some extent trust AI — for general searches, work tasks and writing, than…
