Less than a week after the federal government announced it would not add Northern Rockies gray wolves back onto the list of endangered species, more than a dozen conservation groups on Wednesday forecasted their intention to sue over the decision.
Conservation groups argue that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the federal agency charged with oversight of species protected under the Endangered Species Act, used flawed population estimates and overestimated the population’s genetic diversity in its finding that wolves are not at risk of extinction.
They also argue that the federal government is downplaying risks to the animals’ viability posed by anti-predator laws in states like Montana, a claim that went to the heart of two petitions conservation groups submitted to USFWS in 2021 seeking a restoration of federal protections.
“The current killing regimes in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming put wolves at obvious risk of extinction in the foreseeable future, and this core population is key to wolf survival in the West,” Western Watersheds Project Executive Director Erik Molvar said in a statement. “Even if the states’ population estimates were defensible — and they aren’t, according to recent scientific analyses — the feds are underestimating the extinction agenda of anti-wolf state governments and the small and tentative state of recovering wolf populations elsewhere in the West.”
There are “vast portions of the West where wolves have yet to recover“ and they “exist in only small populations in the West Coast and Colorado habitats they are slowly reinhabiting,” according to Kelly Nokes, a Western Environmental Law Center attorney representing the conservation groups.
RELATED
Federal government denies petitions to restore protections for gray wolves
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service denied restoration of federal protection for Northern Rockies gray wolves. The agency said wolves are “not at risk of extinction in the Western United States now or in the foreseeable future.”
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to explore relisting the gray wolf
On opening day of Montana’s expanded wolf-hunting season, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said it has decided to conduct an in-depth status review to determine whether state management plans aiming to aggressively reduce wolf populations threaten the recovery of gray wolves.
In a review of gray wolf habitat, demographics and distribution issued by USFWS last December, human-caused mortality is identified as the “primary stressor” for gray wolves. Still, human-caused mortality is not pronounced enough to lead to an extinction of Northern Rockies wolves in the next 100 years “as long as future mortality rates are within the bounds” of the agency’s analysis, which informed the decision issued by USFWS on Feb. 2 not to relist the animals.
Last week Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte said he supported USFWS’s decision not to restore wolves’ federal protections, according to reporting by the Daily Montanan. Montana has generally favored state management of its wildlife over more restrictive federal management frameworks, especially when it comes to predators like wolves and grizzly bears.
“In Montana, we have demonstrated our ability to appropriately conserve the gray wolf using a science-based approach, and we look forward to continuing to do so in the years to come,” Gianforte said in a statement.
The notice of intent to sue starts a 60-day timer for the USFWS to review the conservation groups’ claims. Once that timer runs out, the conservation groups can file a lawsuit in federal court challenging the agency’s decision.
Groups that signed the notice of intent to sue include Wilderness Watch, Trap Free Montana, Alliance for the Wild Rockies and WildEarth Guardians.
Another coalition of environmental groups — The Center for Biological Diversity, The Humane Society of the United States and the Sierra Club — also filed a notice of intent to sue on Wednesday. That petition also highlights anti-predator laws in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, and questions the integrity of population estimates used to assess the size and distribution of wolves.
LATEST STORIES
What Montana’s U.S. House candidates are saying about the southern border
Even though the U.S.-Mexico border is 1,000 miles south of Montana, congressional candidates have made it a central issue in this year’s election. Here’s what they said when we asked them what they’d like to change.
The GOP-heavy primary for Montana’s utility-regulating PSC
Lawmakers, former commissioners and engineers are heavily represented in the June 4 primary election for the Public Service Commission, which has been heavily red for two decades. Here’s how the candidates are differentiating themselves.
Medicaid unwinding deals a blow to a tenuous system of care for Native Americans
About a year into the process of redetermining Medicaid eligibility after the COVID-19 public health emergency, more than 20 million people nationwide have been kicked off the joint federal-state program for low-income families. Native Americans are proving particularly vulnerable to losing coverage and face greater obstacles to re-enrolling in Medicaid or finding other coverage.