A coal-fired power plant towers over the town of Colstrip, Montana. A conveyor belt (foreground) carries coal directly from the nearby Rosebud coal mine. Credit: Stephen Smith for Reveal

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has finalized rules to reduce pollution associated with the combustion of fossil fuels for electricity. The new rules are anticipated to have major implications for Montana coal mines and the power plants they supply, including the state’s largest electricity generator located in Colstrip.

The EPA’s adopted rules will “protect all communities from pollution and improve public health without disrupting the delivery of reliable electricity,” according to a statement the EPA released Thursday.

“EPA is proud to make good on the Biden-Harris Administration’s vision to tackle climate change and to protect all communities from pollution in our air, water and in our neighborhoods,” EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan said. “By developing these standards in a clear, transparent, inclusive manner, EPA is cutting pollution while ensuring that power companies can make smart investments and continue to deliver reliable electricity for all Americans.”

The rules will set strict standards for fossil fuel plants’ release of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. Metals like mercury, a neurotoxin that becomes airborne when coal is burned for electricity, will also be subject to tighter regulations under the new regulations. Additionally, coal plant owners must safely close inactive coal ash ponds and clean up contamination.

All three sets of standards are expected to spur major changes for Colstrip’s owners, who have drawn fire from public health advocates critical of the plant’s lack of modern technology that could limit the public’s exposure to mercury, arsenic, lead, nickel and other materials tied to various cancers and diseases.

Environmental and public health organizations celebrated the rule’s adoption, saying that tougher regulations will go a long way toward addressing the power sector’s role in climate change and reducing illness and mortality associated with toxic materials and fine particulates. Industry groups and elected officials in Montana blasted the rule, arguing that the EPA has overstepped its authority by imposing rules that will make power production and consumption more expensive.

Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen, who last August joined 20 other attorneys general in urging the EPA not to move forward with the carbon dioxide rule, pledged to file a lawsuit to stop  “Biden’s overreaching policies and woke green agenda.”

“Since the Biden administration remains determined to shut down coal production in Montana, I will be challenging the rule in court to protect Montanans from this attack on reliable, affordable energy,” Knudsen said in an email Thursday. “Not only will this rule have a devastating impact on our economy, but wind and solar power won’t keep us warm in the winter.”

In their 2023 letter to the EPA, the attorneys general equated the draft carbon dioxide rule with the kind of “generation-shifting” proposal underlying the Clean Power Plan, a policy that was proposed by former president Barack Obama but ultimately blocked by courts

If the rules stand as written, they are expected to force coal plants to shutter within the next 15 years or make massive investments in still-developing carbon capture and sequestration technology.

“Not only will this rule have a devastating impact on our economy, but wind and solar power won’t keep us warm in the winter.”

Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen

Emily Grubert, an associate professor of sustainable energy policy at the University of Notre Dame, told the New York Times that complying with the EPA’s directive to reduce 90% of its carbon dioxide emissions by 2039 makes it unlikely that the nation’s approximately 200 operating coal plants will be operating in 15 years.

“Practically speaking, you’re talking about adding a billion dollars of capital investment to a plant that was at end of life anyway,” she said.

NorthWestern Energy, the shareholder-owned utility that relies on Colstrip’s nearly 40-year-old plant to supply electricity to about two-thirds of Montana’s residents, released a statement saying that the standards for mercury and air toxics “will impact” the Colstrip plant.

“The EPA’s decision includes timelines and unproven technology that will increase the cost of energy service and jeopardize reliability,” NorthWestern Energy President and CEO Brian Bird said in the statement.

NorthWestern did not provide answers to Montana Free Press’ questions about the investment that would be required to bring Colstrip into compliance with the air toxics rule, though plant operator Talen told the EPA last year that complying with the draft rule could cost as much as $600 million. NorthWestern’s 2023 annual report noted upgrades to comply with the CO2 and air toxics rules could have a “material negative impact” on its coal plants and make the continued operation of Colstrip “uneconomic.” 

The timeline for complying with the air toxics standards is three years, though a one-year extension could be granted under some circumstances. 

In January 2023, NorthWestern announced its plan to double its ownership share in Colstrip by acquiring a Washington-based utility’s stake in the plant effective January 2026.

U.S. Rep. Matt Rosendale and Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte, both Republicans, expressed frustration with the new rules. In a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, Rosendale said the rule “will jeopardize our economy, tank American jobs and threaten reliable power in the United States.”

In an emailed statement, Gianforte accused President Joe Biden of “trying to appease the far-left wing of his party in an election year by waging war on fossil fuels.”

“These regulations punish business and push companies into the arms of China and other countries with lower energy costs,” Gianforte continued. “While Montana embraces an all-of-the-above energy strategy, it’s time for President Biden to listen to state leaders, stop picking winners and losers, and start prioritizing American consumers and workers.”

Clint Penny, the business manager of a boilermakers union and president of the Montana Building Trades Council, expressed concern about the impacts on communities that are reliant on the high-paying jobs that Colstrip supplies. 

“As people, we evolve and change, but let’s not change so fast that we forget about the people that build the infrastructure and retire it before its useful life cycle,” Penny said.

RELATED

Montana attorney general urges the EPA to scrap CO2 rule aimed at the energy sector

In a 55-page letter dated Aug. 8, the signatories argued that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is overstepping its authority by imposing strict carbon dioxide standards on the energy sector. The EPA has described the rule as an effort to safeguard public health and eliminate 617 million tons of atmosphere-warming carbon dioxide emissions from one of the largest domestic sources of emissions.

Public health and environmental advocates described the rule as a win for public health that will benefit communities exposed to the pollution wrought by coal combustion.

“It is wonderful to see the EPA finally moving forward on this action, which will save lives,” Billings pulmonologist Robert Merchant said in an email. “It’s been hard to see the air pollution from coal-fired power plants killing people and damaging their brains and their lungs because their corporate leaders chose not to implement 50-year-old particulate control technology.” 

Michelle Uberuaga, the Montana field organizer for Moms Clean Air Force, said in an email that the EPA’s update to the standards is a “really good thing for the people most directly impacted, especially kids.” 

“Colstrip has had a lot of opportunities to upgrade their technology for many, many years — decades — and they haven’t,” Uberuaga said in a later interview with MTFP. “This rule is going to require them to finally upgrade that technology to clean up some of the worst contaminants.”

Over the past decade, coal-fired power plants have been on an uncertain trajectory in Montana as utility companies in the region plan their exit from the most polluting fossil fuel to meet climate objectives or turn to cheaper electricity sources such as natural gas and wind

Montana holds the largest coal reserves in the nation. Coal from mines in central and southeastern Montana is sold to state, regional and even international buyers.

LATEST STORIES

Amanda Eggert studied print journalism at the University of Montana. Prior to becoming a full-time journalist, Amanda spent four years working with the Forest Service as a wildland firefighter. After leaving the Forest Service in 2014, Amanda worked for Outside magazine as an editorial fellow before joining Outlaw Partners’ staff to lead coverage for Explore Big Sky newspaper and contribute writing and editing to Explore Yellowstone and Mountain Outlaw magazines. Prior to joining Montana Free Press’ staff in 2021 Amanda was a freelance writer, researcher and interviewer. In addition to writing...